Volume 13 Number 2
![](https://www.ilc.unsw.edu.au/sites/ilc.unsw.edu.au/files/styles/medium/public/images/covers/AILR%20Volume%2013%202009.jpg?itok=xDPEMfBL)
Past Injustices and Future Protections: On the Politics of Promising by Paul Muldoon
Aboriginal Self-Determination vs the Propertisation of Traditional Culture: The Case of Sacred Wanjina Sites
Christoph B Graber
Economic Rights, Culture Claims and a Culture of Piracy in the Indigenous Art Market: What Should We Expect from the Western Legal System?
Kathy Bowrey
Rawls and the Legitimacy of Australian Government
Paul Patton
The Place of Indigenous Rights in the Bill of Rights Debate: A Rawlsian Justification
Bede Harris
Evaluating the Performance of Indigenous Sentencing Courts
Nigel Stobbs and Geraldine Mackenzie
Court and Tribunal Decisions
Australia
FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd v Cox [2009] FCAFC 49
Australian Crime Commission v NTD8 [2009] FCAFC 86
Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corporation (Jamukurnu – Yapalikunu)/Western Australia/Holocene Pty Ltd [2009] NNTTA 49
Shaw v Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2009] FCA 1397
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Dreamtime Creations Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1545
Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act v Illawarra Local Aboriginal Land Council [2009] NSWCA 289
Turley v Byrne [2009] NTSC 22
James v Western Australia [2009] FCA 1262
Adnyamathanha No 1 Native Title Claim Group v South Australia (No 2) [2009] FCA 359
Canada
Brokenhead First Nations v Canada, 2009 FC 982
Ahousaht Indian Band and Nation v Canada (Attorney General), 2009 BCSC 1494
United States of America
Carcieri v Salazar, 555 US ___ (2009)
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Admissibility: Hul’qumi’num Treaty Group – Canada, Report No 105/09
Disclaimer
While UNSW, the Indigenous Law Centre and the Australian Indigenous Law Review attempt to make the information on this site accurate and keep it current, it is provided in good faith and no express or implied warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or currency is given. Nothing contained in this site, including the contents of the Australian Indigenous Law Review, is intended by UNSW, the Indigenous Law Centre or the editor of the Indigenous Law Bulletin to be legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for legal or other professional advice. Readers should make and rely on their own enquiries when making decisions affecting their own interests.
Subscribe
To find out more please click here.